Anyone who knows me, knows that I’m equal parts geek and nerd. To those who don’t know me, they are often shocked when I start correcting them on technology information. When you get to know me, you know I just find comfort in tech. I don’t know why exactly, I guess I just do.
Did I start out my career thinking this is what I wanted to do? No. Not at all. When I was at school, I wanted to be a fashion designer. People find that even more hilarious – me, having a sense of fashion, again that’s often surprising but it’s a post for another day.
Then I wanted to be an interior designer. That’s my part time passion, interiors.
I fell into my career in a rather haphazard manner. Started out selling computers, and blagged my way into an IT support job with ICL. From there I became a bit of an autodidact. Only ever had 4 hours of training in 17 years, and that was my first day on the job. Being taught how to hard code autoexec and config.sys files on windows machines.
So why exactly would I choose technology? Perhaps I could see the difference that technology could make. I got excited at the prospects of taking something that you always had to do by hand and using computing technology to make it better. It’s somewhat grandiose to say it, but I believed (and I still do), that computers have got the power to save lives.
It’s rather sad that we’re still not pushing the boundaries of what they’re capable of. In this big data revolution we still throw around words easily because they’re fashionable without considering what the meaning of them really are. Instead of just saying things we should be doing more with them.
So it was the article on Sky News a couple of weeks ago (the link to which I can’t find which is typical), that made me smile. A pilot scheme run in two hospitals using iPods to monitor patient vitals had saved around 300 lives. Amazing huh?
Just think… if transforming a paper process into something digital with only a tiny bit of what’s possible, and it can save 300 lives, why on earth are we not doing more? Technology doesn’t need to be big and expensive, it can be small and plausible.